Archive for the '2008' Category

Page 2 of 7

iTunes Genius

With Apple’s newest release of iTunes they included a feature called “Genius” that creates playlists based on a single song. In my limited experiences with it I am really impressed. Naming something “Genius” (yes that’s with a capital G) is usually a recipe for disappointment, even from Apple. Their Geniuses in the Apple Store at Sherway Gardens often are without the answers to my questions…

But I digress, the software Genius is awesome. Choose a song from your library and click the button. A 25 song playlist is automagically generated consisting of songs that go well together. And if you click on any song in the playlist the Genius sidebar displays related songs with a button to Buy the song immediately from the iTunes store.

So is the genius feature that the software works so well and creates great playlists, or is it that Apple have made it so incredibly easy for you to spend money on new music?

Burn After Reading is what they should have done with the script

Uggh…. there were a few funny spots but the even the “league of morons” featured was not enough to make this a worthwhile trip to the theatre.

Kudos to the trailer/commercial editors as they really sucked me in on this one… and it’s rare that I get this hosed on a movie not living up to its advertising. But that’s what happened here. Professional critics seem to generally love this film stating that it is another masterpiece from the Coen Brothers; and I suppose had I been more clued in to their oeuvre – specifically O Brother, Where Art Thou?, Raising Arizona, and The Hudsucker Proxy – I probably would have skipped it completely.

Oh well.

It gets worse…

What the heck does this prove other than the fact that Microsoft is totally lost – or as one of the commenters on the Youtube page for this video said, “having anything Microsoft in your home isn’t good and messes everything up.”

This is Microsofts answer to Apple’s Mac vs. PC Ads?

The New 90210

So last night marked the premiere of the much hyped new 90210 and I was shocked and disappointed. I’m sure that the opening scene of a guy receiving head in the front seat of his Escalade had many parents reaching for the remotes to quickly change the channel… and I’m not sure if they’d bother to come back. The show was far too predictable, and seems to have lost the key draw from the original version – that the kids were real people. (Despite being twenty and thirtysomethings… which leads me to the highlight of last nights episode for me: Hannah Zuckerman, presumably Andrea’s daughter from the original, is delivering the news when the teacher cracks, “What is she, 30?”)

If a family has a private jet and the kid drives a Bentley Continental ($200,000 +) car I really doubt that he attends the local public high school. And the collection of Aston Martins and Ferrari’s in the school parking lot was too much.

Another bothersome point for me is that they seem to have not only stolen Shenae Grimes from Degrassi, but also many of their ideas – the media class, the newscast, and some of their editing style.

At the end of the day this show will probably succeed because it has a lot of money behind it – not because it is a good show.

Band Travels On Bicycles And Uses Bikes To Generate Electricity For All Performances!

Who Knew That Window Coverings Could Make Me So Happy?

It was a long three weeks living in our new home without window coverings but on Sunday Gus Giancos from Oasis Custom Window Coverings arrived to provide us some much needed privacy, and darkness for sleeping.

He installed 5% weave roller blinds throughout our house and the change is incredible. They really complete the look of the house, and kill all of the heat generated by the sun. And although 5% doesn’t sound like much getting through the house is still bright, and we can still see out!

And not to sound too much like a commercial, but if you’re looking for new window coverings, Gus can be reached at (416) 977-8887. (And thinking about it now I should’ve asked for a discount in exchange for this free plug!)

Drink Outside the Box

Published: August 17, 2008

ITALY’S Agriculture Ministry announced this month that some wines that receive the government’s quality assurance label may now be sold in boxes. That’s right, Italian wine is going green, and for some connoisseurs, the sky might as well be falling.

But the sky isn’t falling. Wine in a box makes sense environmentally and economically. Indeed, vintners in the United States would be wise to embrace the trend that is slowly gaining acceptance worldwide.

Wine in a box has been around for more than 30 years — though with varying quality. The Australians were among the first to popularize it. And hardly a fridge in the south of France, especially this time of year, is complete without a box of rosé. Here in America, by contrast, boxed wine has had trouble escaping a down-market image. But now that wine producers are talking about reducing their carbon footprint — that is, the amount of carbon dioxide emitted in the transportation of wine — selling the beverage in alternative, lighter packaging instead of heavier glass seems like the right thing to do.

More than 90 percent of American wine production occurs on the West Coast, but because the majority of consumers live east of the Mississippi, a large part of carbon-dioxide emissions associated with wine comes from simply trucking it from the vineyard to tables on the East Coast. A standard wine bottle holds 750 milliliters of wine and generates about 5.2 pounds of carbon-dioxide emissions when it travels from a vineyard in California to a store in New York. A 3-liter box generates about half the emissions per 750 milliliters. Switching to wine in a box for the 97 percent of wines that are made to be consumed within a year would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about two million tons, or the equivalent of retiring 400,000 cars.

But here’s another reason to sell wine in a box. America will soon become the largest wine market in the world. In recent years, we overtook Italy, and France is now in our sights. (This is total consumption, not per person; we are still well behind by the latter measure.) As Americans drink more wine, we will be drinking it not only on special occasions like dates and weddings, but also on Monday nights with pizza. That’s a lot of wine — and potentially a big carbon footprint.

Although some sommeliers may scoff at wine from a plastic spigot, boxes are perfect for table wines that don’t need to age, which is to say, all but a relative handful of the top wines from around the world. What’s more, boxed wine is superior to glass bottle storage in resolving that age-old problem of not being able to finish a bottle in one sitting. Once open, a box preserves wine for about four weeks compared with only a day or two for a bottle. Boxed wine may be short on charm, but it is long on practicality.

Which leads to a final reason for boxed wine: it’s so much more economical. Having an affordable glass of wine may be the best way to keep our 15-year bull market for wine consumption running. It also would help keep per-glass prices of wine from rising as the dollar falls.

The main obstacle to a smaller carbon footprint for wine is the frequently abysmal quality of wine put in boxes. But that’s an easy fix: raise the quality.

In the past few years, the boxed wine sold in America has shown some signs of improvement. There’s been wine in a stylish cardboard tube made by a top winemaker in Burgundy. There’s a good, old-vine grenache from the Pyrenees sold in a box. A succulent unoaked malbec from organically grown grapes in Argentina is now available in the United States thanks to the 1-liter TetraPak, which is also being used by three renegade Californians who have a line of wines that are sold in 250-milliliter packages — about the size of juice boxes, but without straws. And then, of course, there’s the news from Italy.

Producers everywhere need to deliver better wine in a box — and make it snappy. Perhaps they will if consumers start to demand that everyday wines that don’t need to age in a bottle be sold in a box. If you’re sorry about the change, squeeze off another well-preserved, affordable, low-carbon serving of boxed wine and mull it over.

Tyler Colman is the author of “Wine Politics: How Governments, Environmentalists, Mobsters and Critics Influence the Wines We Drink,” and he blogs at DrVino.com.

Home Depot vs. Canadian Tire

Take care of your customers.

I own a small business and if I don’t take care of my customers, they don’t stay customers… which is why I’m amazed that customers/consumers continue to accept crap service and products. With our recent move into a new home I’ve become much more familiar with the layout of Home Depot than I thought possible. But as a former employee of Canadian Tire, and a proud “Support Canadian companies” kinda guy you’d think that I’d be spending my time and money there; but I’m not. Our local HD and CTC are only geographically separated by a kilometre, but they are light years apart in their approach to customer service.

It takes me longer to find a staff member at Canadian Tire than it does for me to go to Home Depot, park, find my item, pay and get back to the car.

There are staff around every corner in Home Depot and they all are willing to take you to what you are looking for. At CTC if you are lucky enough to find a staffer, they simply tell you, “Oh that’s in aisle 84.”

Is Canadian Tire still riding high on it’s Canadiana image? Or do we just happen to live near the best Home Depot and the worst Canadian Tire?

CHSI – Cooney

In February Leah and I purchased a new home. At our purchase date the foundation of the house was all that existed, which provided an opportunity for us to add some custom features at a lower cost than adding them after the house was complete. Chief among these features was the wiring of speakers to our patio, some internet cabling, repositioning of cable outlets, and some home security components. We contacted the builder to see if they could recommend a subcontractor to do the work for us.

CHSI was suggested as the one for the job, and accordingly I contacted Katherine and detailed the work we wanted done. She was hard to reach via cell, and rarely returned my emails. But when she did she confirmed all of the details of what we wanted, we agreed on the costs, and I gave her approval to proceed with the installation.

Over the course of the next four months CHSI did not complete any of the work the committed to doing, contrary to what Katherine was telling me every time we spoke.

As our closing date was fast approaching I contacted the builder and coincidentally Katherine from CHSI called in at the same time. The builder conferenced her in to our call and put her on the spot about our unit, and the planned installs. At that time Katherine committed to having all our work complete on July 30.

On July 31 we completed our Pre-Delivery Inspection of our new home and to our surprise (not really) CHSI had not completed any of the work requested.

Again I called the builder who in turn contacted CHSI. Katherine called me and told me that everything was done, I just couldn’t see it because it was all in the walls… Ha! This company is useless. Take heed of my words and find another custom installer.

I’m at fault for not finding another contractor when I thought that this was getting off the rails, but as none of the add ons are critical to our happiness I let it slide. But I have no idea how this company stays in business based on our experience.